![]() ![]() Finally, the article presents a model which visualises and fuses the two theories, concluding that the “I” in lyric poetry is fictive-labile. ![]() ![]() Rader, however, needs to incorporate reflections on how narrativity affects this poet-speaker relationship. Lanser’s criteria are applied to each type of lyric poem. It distinguishes between four types of lyric poems based on the affinity or distance between the poet and the speaker in the poem. To remedy this, Ralph Rader’sessay “The Dramatic Monologue and Related Lyric Forms” is introduced. This article, however, finds it problematic that she presupposes that lyric poetry is a constant genre. She proposes five criteria which make the reader prone to infer attachment, and as she finds them almost always to be present in lyric poetry, she concludes that it is primed for authorial attachment. In this essay she dealswith homodiegetic fiction, and she tries to conjecture under which circumstances readers are likely to attach an “I” in a piece of literature to the “I” of the empirical author. The first essay is Susan Lanser’s “The ‘I’ of the Beholder: Equivocal Attachments and the Limits of Structuralist Narratology”. are used to enhance the other’s argument. But is it okay to think of this as the “default setting” of lyric poetry? In this paper, two congenial essays are broached and both of them. THE FICTIVE-LABILE “I” OF POETRY | This article asks the question: what is the fictional status of the I-enunciation in a lyric poem? When people read a lyric poem in the first person, theytend to automatically assume that the poet speaks in her own voice. Yuzhen Lin: A Comparative Perspective on Unnaturalness: A Review of Biwu Shang’s Unnatural Narrative across Borders: Transnational and Comparative Perspectivesįang Cai: A Discipline with Local Characteristics and a Global Perspective: Zhong Guo Xu Shi Xue Yili Tang: Character Narration and Fictionality in Julian Barnes’s Flaubert’s Parrot Vladimir Biti: Almost the Same but not Quite: Kafka and His Assignees Xiaomeng Wan: Body as Resource of Narrative Communication: An Intersection of Corporeal Narratology with Rhetorical Narratology Samuel Caleb Wee: Songs of ‘Experientiality’: Reconsidering the Relationship between Poeticity and Narrativity in Postclassical NarratologyĬharlotte Lindemann: Dialogue and the Limits of Narrative Discourse:įlorian Zitzelsberger: On the Queer Rhetoric of Metalepsis John Pier: Is There a French Postclassical Narratology? ![]() Īrleen Ionescu: Postclassical Narratology: Twenty Years Laterīrian Richardson: Recent Work in Unnatural Narrative Studiesīiwu Shang: Postclassical Narratology in China: Receptions and Variations The articles included in this issue can be accessed at. This is the Introduction to volume 9 (2009) of Word and Text - A Journal of Literary Studies and Linguistics that I co-edited with Laurent Milesi and Biwu Shang. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |